FastAPI vs Django in 2024 — Which One Should You Choose
A detailed comparison of FastAPI and Django: performance, ecosystem, and the right use cases for each. Helping you pick the right tool for your project.
FastAPI vs Django in 2024
One of the most common questions from clients: "Should I use FastAPI or Django for the backend?" The answer depends on the project, and in this article I'll compare both frameworks honestly.
Quick Overview
Django — "batteries included". Created in 2005, battle-tested. ORM, admin panel, auth, forms — all out of the box.
FastAPI — a modern async framework. Created in 2018. Maximum API development speed, auto-documentation, full typing support.
Performance
FastAPI is built on Starlette + Pydantic, fully asynchronous:
# FastAPI — async endpoint
@app.get("/users/{user_id}")
async def get_user(user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db)):
user = await db.get(User, user_id)
return user
Django is traditionally synchronous, but native async was added in Django 4.1+:
# Django — async view
async def get_user(request, user_id):
user = await User.objects.aget(id=user_id)
return JsonResponse({"name": user.name})
Benchmarks: FastAPI handles ~50,000 req/s, Django ~5,000 req/s under the same conditions. But for most projects this difference doesn't matter.
Out-of-the-box Features
| Feature | Django | FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| ORM | ✅ built-in | ❌ needs SQLAlchemy |
| Admin panel | ✅ | ❌ needs third-party |
| Auth & sessions | ✅ | ❌ needs fastapi-users |
| Swagger / ReDoc | ❌ | ✅ automatic |
| WebSockets | partial | ✅ native |
| Validation | forms/serializers | ✅ Pydantic |
| Type safety | basic | ✅ excellent |
When to Choose Django
- Need a quick admin panel (models → CRUD in 5 minutes)
- Standard website with templates
- Team already knows Django
- Monolith with auth, profiles, content management
# Django — 5 lines and you have a full CRUD admin
from django.db import models
class Article(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
content = models.TextField()
created = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
class Meta:
ordering = ["-created"]
When to Choose FastAPI
- Pure REST / GraphQL API
- Microservice architecture
- Need auto-documentation out of the box
- High performance requirements
- AI/ML services (great integration with Python ecosystem)
# FastAPI — typing, validation, documentation automatically
from pydantic import BaseModel, EmailStr
class UserCreate(BaseModel):
email: EmailStr
name: str
age: int | None = None
@app.post("/users", response_model=UserResponse, status_code=201)
async def create_user(payload: UserCreate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db)):
user = User(**payload.model_dump())
db.add(user)
await db.commit()
return user
My Personal Pick
In 90% of projects I choose FastAPI:
- Pydantic typing eliminates a whole class of bugs
- Swagger/ReDoc — clients immediately see the API
- Async — the right architecture for I/O-heavy workloads
- Easy to test with
httpx
I choose Django when I need a quick admin panel or CMS-like logic.
Django + FastAPI Together
A popular pattern — use both:
├── backend/
│ ├── api/ # FastAPI — REST endpoints
│ └── admin/ # Django — internal admin panel
This gives you FastAPI speed for the client API and Django admin convenience for internal operations.
Summary
| Use Case | Choice |
|---|---|
| SaaS, microservice, API | FastAPI |
| CMS, corporate website | Django |
| Telegram bot with admin | FastAPI + Django admin |
| ML/AI service | FastAPI |
| Quick MVP with auth | Django |
Both frameworks are excellent tools. It's all about the task.
Need help choosing your stack or building something? Get in touch.